Full Coverage vs. Liability-Only Auto Insurance: Which Do You Need?
Most drivers pay too much for coverage they don't need — or too little for coverage they do. The cutoff line, in real numbers.
Written by
Michael Ecke
Founder & Editor-in-Chief
Reviewed by
CarSavr Editorial Team
Last updated:
5 min read
Option A
$135 – $215Full Coverage
Liability + collision + comprehensive.
Pros
- Repairs your car after at-fault crashes
- Comprehensive covers theft, hail, vandalism
- Required by every auto lender
- Peace of mind on newer vehicles
Cons
- 30–60% more expensive than liability-only
- Deductible eats small claims
- May exceed the car's value on older models
- Premiums spike fast after claims
Option B
$55 – $95Liability-Only
Covers the other guy. Not your car.
Pros
- Cheapest legal way to drive
- No coverage gap when car is paid off
- Right call for old, low-value cars
- Same legal protection as full coverage
Cons
- Your car gets totaled? You pay
- Theft, hail, vandalism not covered
- Some states' minimums are dangerously low
- Cannot satisfy a loan/lease requirement
Feature-by-feature
| Feature | Full Coverage | Liability-Only |
|---|---|---|
| Avg. annual premium (national) | $2,000 | $700 |
| Pays for your car (at-fault) | Yes | No |
| Theft / vandalism | Yes | No |
| Hail / weather damage | Yes | No |
| Required by lenders | Yes | No (paid-off only) |
| Other driver's injury / car | Yes | Yes |
| Deductible | $250–$2,500 | None |
Which is right for you?
Pick Full Coverage if…
Your car is under 10 years old, worth $4,000+, financed, or you can't easily afford to replace it out of pocket.
Pick Liability-Only if…
Your car is paid off, worth under $4,000, AND you have an emergency fund to replace it — the premium savings beat the coverage value.
Run the numbers yourself
Insurance Cost Estimator