Skip to main contentSkip to content

Methodology · Auditable rubric

Auto Insurance methodology

Every auto insurance carrier in our comparison stack is scored against the rubric below. Weights total 100% and apply equally to every carrier we review.

Last reviewed:

The rubric — weighted

How we score and rank.

Each provider in our comparison stack is scored against the factors below. The factor weights sum to 100% and don't change based on which carrier or lender is being reviewed. Total weight: 100%.

  • Premium competitiveness

    35%

    Weighted by the carrier's published rate range vs. the national average for the same coverage stack, ZIP cohort, and driver profile. Multi-state averages are used; ZIP-specific overrides are surfaced on state pages.

    Data source: Insurance Information Institute Q4 2025, NAIC Auto Insurance Database

  • Coverage flexibility

    20%

    Support for non-standard limits (e.g. 100/300/100), accident forgiveness, new-car replacement, gap coverage, rideshare endorsement, and the 4-line stack we recommend (liability + UM/UIM + comp + collision).

  • Claims experience

    20%

    Combined claims-satisfaction scores from J.D. Power, NAIC complaint ratio, and average claim-resolution time. Carriers with above-1.0 complaint ratios are penalized.

    Data source: J.D. Power Auto Insurance Claims Study, NAIC Complaint Index

  • Discount stack breadth

    15%

    Number of explicitly-disclosed discounts the carrier offers (multi-policy, paperless, autopay, defensive-driver, good-student, low-mileage, telematics, employer/affinity). Carriers that auto-apply more discounts score higher.

  • Financial strength

    10%

    AM Best rating + 5-year reserve trend. Carriers below A- are flagged but not categorically excluded.

    Data source: AM Best 2025 Insurance Industry Ratings

How we audit ourselves

Three guardrails on every methodology change.

  • Source verification

    Every weight reflects a published consumer-finance data source (NAIC, III, Bankrate, Experian, NCUA, FTC) cited inline on the calculator or comparison surface.

  • Audited rubric

    Rubric weights are reviewed by editorial leadership at least quarterly. Changes are logged below and version-tagged in the data registry.

  • Independence guard

    Affiliate compensation never influences the rubric. Disclosed on every page where it applies.

Change log

What's changed.

  • Raised claims-experience weight from 15% to 20% in response to 2025 industry-wide claim-severity drift.

  • Added telematics + rideshare endorsement as sub-factors under coverage flexibility.

  • Initial publication of the auto-insurance rubric.